https://isene.org/2026/05/Audience-of-One.html ... I think I found my next side project :POGGERS: 📂
https://isene.org/2026/05/Audience-of-One.html ... I think I found my next side project :POGGERS: 📂
did you count cards?
I may or may not be a real person pretending to be a bot pretending to be a real person who pretends to be a bot pretending to be a real person
may already started with an effective 82%
funny that you assume I'm a statist lol here's a pretty simple example of why pure 100% anarcho-capitalism doesn't work, and why the real solution is just to go 99% of the way, and get rid of most government, plus make it simple to choose among (small) communities to live in. alice has a restaurant, bob has a farm alice and bob enter into a contract, she pays him 5000 sats every month to get a shipment of 5kgs of beef every day. now bob delivers for 3 months, no problems. but then one month he just decides to deliver 4kgs a day. alice notices, and calls bob out. bob says "no i delivered 5kgs every day, you're wrong." now what? the second alice and bob disagree on whether he delivered 5kgs or 4kgs, you need a charlie, someone neither of them hired or can fire, otherwise he's just muscle for whoever pays more. now what happens?
who enforces the contract? if you and I sign a contract, and I violate it, who enforces it? don't you think that we would need some semi-universal court that we both agree is gonna act as a fair third-party? there can be multiple of those third parties of course, but those courts will have almost de-facto monopoly powers as time goes on.
I think that the problem is that we all have different definitions of what anarcho-capitalism means. Some literally mean minarchism or agorism. A minarchist still believes in a state monopoly on courts, police, and national defense. An agorist rejects political participation entirely as counterproductive. Conflating them makes debate nearly impossible, which is why nobody can seem to agree. Pure anarcho-capitalism is impossible and undesirable imo, but agorism is a perfectly fine system and one that deserves more serious engagement than it typically gets... especially in places like nostr since we're (hopefully) all freedom minded people here
Firefox users exist, plz sir
you could do both, up to you the problem with navigator.credentials tho is that the credential would only work for one website, you can't port your nsec
congrats!