Since the acquisition of Twitter in 2022, Elon did nothing to change platform's legacy account-based architecture that doesn't provide self-custody or censorship-resistance. Swapping one tyrant for another did nothing to increase freedoms. On opposite, it gave non-tech savvy users a false sense of freedoms, decelerating adoption of freedom tech like Spasm and Nostr. The same as Zuck, Jack, Durov, or other slave tech overlords, Elon tries to lock users inside his centralized monetizable walled garden. It's worth noting that his efforts to lock Twitter down are nothing new. Elon became rich by working on PayPal, which is a typical centralized fiat-based SlaveFi tech operated from an extremely hostile jurisdiction with KYC and full compliance. He also likes to use state violence against people, his cars are privacy nightmare, and Starlink enforces ridiculous laws across the world. For example, Starlink empowers the global adversary by restricting torrenting, essentially enforcing strong anti-free speech laws based on outrages concepts like copyright, which are usually ignored outside of western police states. In 2026, failing to keep speech locked within his walled garden via technical means, Elon resorted to state violence in attempt to shut down alternative privacy-preserving frontends like Nitter. Here is a short timeline of Elon's war on free speech. https://dark.vegas/twitter-vs-nitter