MUH GROWTH I don't care if your intuition says nobody will invent new tech. Someone will do it, whether you think they will or not. Tail emissions schedule would result in almost permanent deflation too, so you're arguing against your own preferred system, albeit to a lesser degree than the hard cap on total coins ever.

Thanks for this at least 🤙

You might be right, it may be best to not platform them at all.

Lol! Well, dishonesty, to normies, really let's lies spread. So you have a reason to be pissed.

Ludwig Von Mises?

Known and unchangeable really is the key thing. And also unusually scarce. Monero, Bitcoin, and DOGEcojn of all things, all have this in their favor. Kanzan, it is annoying when you try to accuse the other person of not standing on true principles, with every damn interaction, just because they are profiting from increasing marketability of the money they hold, which you are also doing. It's a pretty obviously dishonest tactic.

You've done a really bad job in identifying any real economic problems.

Also, methinks you keep shifting the goalpost and not really addressing the other argument.

No, he answered you, you just turned off your brain. That passage IMPLIES that permanent deflation can be good.

Do you believe in the labor theory of value too? What is this, Calvinism where hard work is the good in itself, not efficient or effective work? Make up your mind about your value theory and metaphysics, man

The other question is what units would your ideal algorithm track? Inflation can only be defined in terms of baskets of goods, which are quite subjective.

The supposed need for the quantity of money to grow in step with goods or productivity

Renoted for the scene

Binary number representation with biological appendages, try it!!

From the June 1999 Phantom Menace issue of Popular Mechanics, back when it was less insufferable

Wait, I'm also the guy going "wait?" Always have been. Wait, I'm also the guy going "wait?" Always have been. Wait, I'm also the guy going "wait?" Always have been. Wait, I'm also the guy going "wait?" Always have been....

But we are godlike, to be fair. Unmatched in sonar capabilities.

Immature women who are too stupid and self deluding to know the difference prefer the high time preference men, yes.

Heyo!

That's one bad motherfucker

At least he understands this.

It's amazing what people will trick themselves into without verifying, and then pretend they know better than everyone else.

Really now? They'll never find a better deal than 20% increase in purchasing power? If this were so, which is ridiculous already, then productivity would cease growing so fast, which means that bitcoin purchasing power would increase slower, which means that opportunities that yield the same as bitcoin had previously been returning, individually assessed and risk adjusted, would become more highly valued and would get funding, so the system is self regulating. It simply selects for investments that clear a decently high bar, like, oh say, using Bitcoin as money and not losing money. I know, SUCH a high bar, almost no investment would ever happen. Psh.