This isn't true. The yield figure excludes routing revenue we earn from block products, it's all external.

for now c= node is the main gateway for all Block lightning activity

https://open.spotify.com/track/0CLhnyxjRUhM9bH1QyUZ17

gm great dirt this morning

I’m allergic to cashews but those look awesome, might try em with almonds

>is it fair to say it is unreasonable to extrapolate these numbers to other routing nodes? absolutely. c= has a few advantages but the main one is our proximity to a service that facilitates real payments from real people over lightning. this proximity creates the liquidity dynamic that let us earn routing fees from the public network (where cash app is neither the upstream nor downstream channel partner).

Palm Springs mid century modern architecture is super cool. Also visited an organic date farm and tried about 8 different varieties of date. Dates are GOAT cycling and tennis energy snack.

All our channels and feerates are public, anyone can see where we allocate liquidity and how much we charge for routing. This alone is extreme transparency. Unfortunately I'm not sure what else I can share. The screenshot shared from goes into more detail than I can. founded c=.

Is your rating based on routing volume and channel utilization or on some other type of reliability metric? If the latter please let me know!

i work on the c= node. according to our logs those channels failed to close cooperatively because your node and ours couldn't agree on a closing feerate. in that case a force close follows. unfortunately this happens sometimes with lightning, but our node is operating fine with no issues. thanks for bringing to our attention!

https://youtu.be/zol2MJf6XNE

No better friend; no worse enemy