I’ve already added support, but Jumble doesn’t support posting voice messages yet. So I was wondering, would replying with text using NIP-22 cause any issues?
If I comment on voice messages using NIP-22, will it show up on yakbak and nostur?
This project makes it easy for non-developers to run their own relay on a personal computer.
What language do you want to add? I can start by using AI to generate the initial translations, and then you can tweak any parts that aren’t accurate.
Offshore exchanges, such as Binance. However, there is a risk of receiving tainted money, which could lead to bank account freezes. Alternatively, cash transactions in Hong Kong are an option.
The latest version of has significantly improved browser performance
Isn’t this something that happened years ago? China used to be the world’s largest crypto trading market and controlled over half of Bitcoin’s total hash rate. If the government hadn’t cracked down, USDT probably wouldn’t be the dominant stablecoin today. That said, having one country control such a large portion of the hash rate might have raised concerns about Bitcoin’s security anyway. Also worth noting: what’s actually banned is the exchange between crypto and fiat. That’s something most people tend to overlook.
Not at the moment. It looks like NIP-17 is starting to gain broad support, though.
Love this relay, no Bitcoin, just cute animals, nature, and interesting daily moments. https://jumble.social/?r=relays.land/spatianostra
In fact, I don’t have the capability to verify users’ ages, haha
The data doesn’t live on just one relay, and npub doesn’t belong to any relay either, so it’s not the same as Mastodon. I guess what fiatjaf wants are relays that curate high-quality content, each with their own filtering strategies to provide feeds tailored to different interests.
That's awesome. But not everyone can run a local model, haha.
Interested in integrating https://translate.jumble.social/ ? It's powered by gemini 2.5 pro
Yep!
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md > Those marked with "reply" denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with "root" denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the "root" marker should be used. > A direct reply to the root of a thread should have a single marked "e" tag of type "root".
I’ve been troubled by this issue too, haha. Maybe the web client isn’t suited for building the following feed using the outbox model. It’s been a long time since I last checked the following feed, haha.
Probably not, but you could try https://pollerama.fun/
For various reasons, this proposal wasn't merged, so Jumble won't be supporting it. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/320 If zap polls are truly needed, I'd prefer to extend NIP-88 instead.
Alright, I’ll make some improvements.
By default, a space is automatically added. If you delete the space manually, there’s still some padding in the edit mode, could that be what caused the confusion?
Welcome to cody spacestr profile!
About Me
Building 👨‍💻 jumble.social & nostr-relay-tray
Interests
- No interests listed.