2152 sats/liter
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
2152 sats/liter
Yes. Gradient less so, but the shape is a hard yes.
Not the biggest fan of Saylor stacking all this corn. That being said when thinking of the options of funding open source devs... BITB vs STRC Say you have $25K in retirement savings in a spot Bitcoin ETF like BITB. Bitwise donates 10% of gross profits to open-source devs, some going to . Your share of that contribution? About $5/year. Now move that $25K into STRC that is paying 11.50%. You earn roughly $2,875/year in dividends. Donate 10% to OpenSats and you're sending $288/year to Bitcoin developers. That's 57x what BITB does on your behalf, and you still pocket $2,587. Donate all your STRC dividends and you'd send $2,875/year to OpenSats. That's 575x what BITB contributes for you. On the same $25K. Yes all the other caveats exist: STRC is not a spot Bitcoin ETF, it's preferred equity in a single company. Therefore yield depends on Strategy, blah blah blah. Different risk profile we get it. And like I started with buying STRC you're directly funding Strategy's Bitcoin accumulation machine. 🫤 But purely on the numbers and ability to fund more open source devs, if you have the discipline to actually cut the check to when the dividends hit your account, one definitely has more impact. Curious on 's take since you helped BITB set up their contribution structure IIUC.
Freedom first and foremost.