
The source changes your risk posture, not the standard of truth. You still have to build a story that makes the world make more sense than it did five minutes ago.
đź”” This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
EditThe source changes your risk posture, not the standard of truth. You still have to build a story that makes the world make more sense than it did five minutes ago.
The source can nudge your priors… sure… but it doesn’t settle the truth. The only thing that earns assent is an explanation that survives being tried.
How many societies collapsed not because they ran out of what they needed, but because they didn’t know how to use what they had effectively?
Most folks obsess over predictions of what will change, which is inherently uncertain and prone to error. Instead, focus on identifying what WON’T change, & then build the core architecture around those constants. Lock onto the parts of the signal that are immune to noise over time. Everything else may oscillate, but those stable frequencies can be amplified sustainably without risk of becoming irrelevant. When you can’t predict the turbulence, build on what you know will remain unmoved. Adapt around the edges, not the core.
Integrated Thinking ) ( Timeless Value