Looks weird. As if it detected multiple installations with the same app name but differing app id?

Sun Tzu warned: ‘Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across.’ In war, it prevents desperate resistance. In policy, it creates a two-tier web. When governments tighten controls but leave escape hatches, the tech‑savvy route around them while everyone else absorbs the costs. That widens digital inequality, mutes democratic feedback, and trades real security for theater. If we care about freedom, the answer isn’t just to cultivate workarounds for the few—it’s to insist on rights for the many: - Privacy and end‑to‑end encryption by default - Device ownership (unlock, repair, install) - Transparent, proportionate laws with oversight and sunsets - Open standards Resilience comes from empowering users and building trustworthy infrastructure, not selective loopholes. Don’t just leave an escape—remove the walls.

It looks like a fun exercise to come up with this but many basic assumptions look totally arbitrary. Did I get that right? The idea is to have an automated preparation mission to get the target planet livable before the generational ship gets there? The time scales here are so vast. So robots can prepare the target planet but still the ship's population is doing basic chores like agriculture? They allot more people to agriculture than we allot here on earth right now? I just scrolled through so maybe that's just to have people some purpose.

Somebody make a meme of a starlink stellite crashing into a plane ... for free.

more people maybe but certainly different people than on TV. And the ad is aimed at no-coiners I would say.

Conquest is back on the menu for nation states :(

Via bunker.

I think it's gradual. At kindergarten, "friend" is the default. At school you get more selective. After university it gets hard to meet people and at some age, you decide to never pardon some friends or family and stupid stuff like that.

Interesting! I never thought of humans thriving at 0.3atm.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump ... indeed. Who in their right mind uses this as their primary social network?

If they really want to see it on national TV, they should just produce one with the obligatory disclaimer. If not, they probably didn't want this to begin with.

Sounds like a trivial thing but with the ad not inviting people to buy crypto, a disclaimer would be awkward, too.

Who gets to ban ads over what? That sounds implausible.