Cry more, degenerate tranny shitcoiner

You will defend Libre RealyGhey for a minority that forces garbage on to a everyone's nodes via pref peering and OOB direct submission; but then rail against 110 for being a minority that can force a majority to "change consensus". How do you reconcile these 2?

I would agree that the precedent is not optimal. but terrible? that's just one opinion. There are other very bad precedents and factors at play that you are not paying enough attention or considering properly IMO. I think that the precedent of allowing an economically illiterage smug clique of corrupt devs to continue degrading the monetary quality of Bitcoin, not fixing bugs, leaving open attack vectors and exploits, increasing the legal and moral risk, encumbering nodes and endangering node decentralization into the future... those are worse. WAY worse precedents. Each one of those is worse IMO than what you think is a "terrible precedent". The change is good you accept that. And the only possible bad outcomes would be real in extreme scenarios where enough mining pools get misled and stuck in rigid ideological restraints like the ones you so effectively spread. If the support from the broad community in pressuring the pools to signal BIP110 is strong enough ALL the doomsday scenarios go away and we have a clean non disruptive upgrade that would be good for Bitcoin and the world.

Ignore the personal attacks Matt. Its true There's been no shortage of those from all sides. If I said something personally offensive to you I take it back. I honestly think you are not a bad apple. Or malicious. Its just that you are not showing your best in your engagement with this issue. I'm pointing to you a video that has ZERO insults or personal attacks. All I'm saying is deal WITH THE ARGUMENTS of the BIP stop engaging with strawmen.

I invoke the 2019 (ish) Cypherpunk Odell spirit to come back and reanimate this 2026 Odell carcass!

I was going to argue that you are confusing the defenders with the attackers... But then I remembered that you are MrHodl and have proven to be unable to understand that or acknowledge any argument. There's no point in wasting my time. All I'm going to say is that maybe, just maybe your'e just an economically iliterate stubborn opinionated pigheaded jerk and not a malicious corrupted actor. I decide to give you the benefit of the doubt. We will see.

Matt. Respectfully. I know you are a busy man but I'm willing to bet that nothing that you have to do (workwise) is more important right now than to engage with these arguments and contend with them. Matthew has done an in depth reaction to your anti BIP110 position. In my opinion reflects very well the feelings and thoughts of most plebs and points out your shortcomings in understanding the proposal and its implications. You have already wasted enough time ignoring this problem and avoided engaging with it. The stakes are now higher than ever and the danger is real. I encourage you to DO THE WORK that you haven't done. Take the time to listen to it if you care for Bitcoin. You are willing to accuse us of being bad faith, and saying we're attacking Bitcoin etc... the least you can do is to hear what we are saying, respond to our arguments and stop beating the strawman you have inside your head. I look forward to your reaction of the reaction video.... or whatever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FNPeqyk7c0

It's a permissionless system. You dont have to like it and you dont have to run BIP110 and you dont have to mine there. Why are you such a Karen about what other people run in their nodes dude?. It's PER MI SSION LESS! If it's a silly dead on arrival idea as you have said 1000 times then it'll never activate. Dont worry! And if it does... Then remember that you are free to GFY + URSF = GFURSF

I agree. But not for the reasons you might think.