βWhat I think is really interesting though, we've spoken when we've talked about these sorts of stories in the past about Isaac Asimov's psychohistory and other rifts. I want to try a new riff here, which is an interesting thought experiment. What happens when hyper forecasting is not just super forecasting, hyper forecasting is connected to capital markets? What happens when the AIs, which are already AI algo traders, are already completely dominating by volume public securities markets? What happens when they have better internal autoregressive models of humanity than humanity does of itself? That's in some sense, it's in the same sense in which large language models were trained off of the autoregressive task of predicting the next token of Internet text better than humans can. Now, LLMs can predict to, at least from a perplexity perspective, the next token I'm going to say in this sentence probably faster than I can generate it myself. What happens when these hyper forecasters are able to generate the next actions by humanity collectively faster than humanity can take it? That's sort of the ultimate market squeeze efficiency outcome, where literally I think capital markets will be where this is maximally interesting where the prediction is actually preemptively shaping the action of the market. And I think those who were so dismissive of the efficient market hypothesis, I think the EMH is going to be crowned king of the capital markets once hyper forecasters like this are ultimately plugged in, which seemingly is imminent.β From Moonshots with Peter Diamandis: Urgent Update- AI Sputnik Moment: Kimi K3 Released w/ Emad Mostaque | Ep. 272, Jul 19, 2026 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/moonshots-with-peter-diamandis/id1648228034?i=1000777429998&r=4622 This material may be protected by copyright.