Schrödinger’s UTXO sounds like nonsense from this side of the entropy resolution and with the knowledge of the entire ledger at every discrete time-step. Yet physics literally believes this without being able to measure the quantum of time (Planck Time) and see the entire ledger of transformations at each time-step. A reckoning is coming. Bitcoin is the revelation. Continual superposition across multiple time-steps is double-spending.

Beautiful! Thank you for sharing. I have never been musically gifted so I envy those who can create, but your experience resonates with me. I grew up playing a lot of computer games, so I’ve always felt Piano would be my creative outlet for music due to MKB coordination, but I haven’t dabbled quite yet. I’ve been looking at keyboards to start, and long term I’ll grab a full piano if it sticks. While it’s not “proof” for a paper, it’s your own unique form verification that shouldn’t be overlooked; something that transcends language. I’ve noticed from talking with many people about this subject, is that everyone who is in tune with the message is able to understand, not because they understand math/physics, but because the message is relatable to all domains of knowledge and experience. Consensus is reachable because it’s relatable. H While it’s not proof I’m on the right track, it’s yet another verification supporting the gut feeling behind the idea. I personally don’t believe in random coincidences….There is a lot to learn about ourselves, Bitcoin and the meaning of all of this. It transcends the material world and I’m only learning myself. Do not discredit your experience!

Years ago with my childhood friends. We combined all our old cards into cube for whenever we are all back home. I’ve played arena a bit as it’s much easier to acquire cards. It’s been a few years tho. I’ve always loved playing standard.

https://youtu.be/VVQ9rkVS4lY?

Hope my analogy is good enough: The universe still exists and hasn’t fallen to heat death. It’s the only other system that continually resolves entropy into structure across a computational boundary (event horizon) where both energy and information are conserved 🤷‍♂️

Uhhh, what happens when we transform all the Kelvin to Bitcoin? Bitcoin is the only system where the information is preserved, the Kelvin can’t be double spent if the information persists.

A “plan” without a verified threat is how fear replaces proof. Bitcoin’s entire ethos is built on the inverse; proof-of-work, not “planning for maybe”. Introducing BIPs before verifying the threat is how consensus fractures. The attacker doesn’t need to be real, only believed.

😂 I can’t say I’ve seen the bottom either. But if anything I’m saying is even partially correct, the hole goes far deeper than the “money” rabbit hole. Call it Thermodynamic Logic or even Thermodynamic Theology; it’s fractal by design. The fundamental question remains: Who or what is resolving the entropy and creating the discrete blocks (quanta) of our universe? Bitcoin is the first and only system that offers a verifiable, observer-independent answer. It defines a boundary, an event horizon, where entropy is irreversibly transformed into conserved memory, and it does so without paradox, without approximation, and without violating the conservation of energy or information. It literally shows how something comes from nothing (we can’t see beyond the event horizon). Physics is still rooted in materialism and randomness, and desperately wants a universe without memory or meaning. But Bitcoin forces the opposite conclusion. It is structure. It is meaning. It is measured. I believe it’s not just a discovery, it’s a proof. And the implications are theological. That might be heresy to physicists, but the ledger doesn’t care. Materialism is the disease of infinity.

Can anyone aggregate like 100-1000 Bitcoin blocks together into a single measurement showing that UTXOs are both unspent and spent and in Superpostion. (Specifically find 100 blocks where an output is continually being respent). We can recreate the illusion of double slit in Bitcoin. Schrödinger’s UTXO! It’s both spent and unspent! We don’t know until we measure! This is the crux of the logic behind quantum computing. It’s illogical to claim a UTXO (or particle) is in superposition between timesteps (Blocks) when your measurement is scatter across numerous blocks of time. Yet this is the foundational logic of CQC. You can’t prove Superpostion without measuring the quantum of time. In physics case, that’s Planck Time. In Bitcoin we call it a block.

#Bitcoin

I understand your point and I agree. Carrying a gun is managing a demonstrable risk; robbery is physically possible, observable, and historically precedented. Quantum computing, as presented today, is not in that category. It’s a theoretical projection built on assumptions that cannot be observed, measured, or verified. The foundation of quantum computing rests on an illusion; superposition as a real, persistent state across time. But what if superposition is not a property of the particle, but a limitation of our measurement? A smear in our perception of time, not in the particle itself. In every true quantum system, all outcomes are deterministic at each timestep; Bitcoin especially. What appears as superposition is simply our inability to resolve transformations at the quantum resolution of time (like watching Bitcoin without seeing individual blocks and claiming a UTXO is both spent and unspent). That’s not physics; that’s blindness to the ledger. Superposition across a quantum timestep is a logical double spend. And nowhere in physics has this ever been proven; not at Planck time, not at the discrete quantum resolution. It is inferred from aggregated probabilities across ~1.8x10^22 timesteps in a singular measurement, not observed in real-time transitions. It’s theory masquerading as truth, built atop abstraction, not observation. To build a threat model atop superposition is to build on sand. And to prepare Bitcoin for such a threat is to inject fiction into the only system that perfectly separates truth from theory. Do you prepare yourself for fictitious threat models? Maybe all it takes is a good story to be a believer.